VS

Home > Backpacking Tents > Easton Mountain Products Rimrock 3 Tent

Easton Mountain Products Rimrock 3 Tent

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Easton Mountain Products Rimrock 3 Tent
Compare with other Backpacking Tents
 Compare
Easton Mountain Products Rimrock 3 Tent VS
All other Backpacking Tents
General
Brand Easton Mountain Products   vs 3% Backpacking Tents have Easton Mountain Products
Price
329  (48.3 lower than average)
vs
377.30

Design type Freestanding Tent  vs 95.5% Backpacking Tents have Freestanding tent
Best use Backpacking  vs 88.6% Backpacking Tents have Backpacking
Seasons
3 season (0.14 season lower than average)
vs
3.14 season

Floor fabric 70-denier Coated Nylon  vs 3% Backpacking Tents have 70-denier coated nylon
Canopy fabric 40-denier No-see-um Mesh  vs 1.5% Backpacking Tents have 40-denier no-see-um mesh
Number of poles
(0.7 lower than average)
vs
2.70

Pole material Easton 7075 Aluminum  vs 1.5% Backpacking Tents have Easton 7075 aluminum
Number of doors
2 doors (0.4 doors higher than average)
vs
1.60 doors

Rainfly fabric 68-denier Coated Polyester  vs 1.5% Backpacking Tents have 68-denier coated polyester
Specifications
Size & Dimensions
Sleeping capacity
3 person (0.68 person higher than average)
vs
2.32 person

Floor area 44.25 Square Feet  vs 0.8% Backpacking Tents have 44.25 square feet
Floor dimensions 88 X 74 Inches 
Floor dimensions - metric 223 X 188 Centimeters 
Peak height
46 inches (3.31 inches higher than average)
vs
42.69 inches

Peak height - metric
117 centimeters (8.28 centimeters higher than average)
vs
108.72 centimeters

Vestibule area 8.8 + 8.8 Square Feet 
Minimum trail weight 5 Lbs. 14 Oz.  vs 0.8% Backpacking Tents have 5 lbs. 14 oz.
Minimum trail weight - metric
2.69 kilograms (0.48 kilograms higher than average)
vs
2.21 kilograms

Fly / footprint pitch weight 4 Lbs. 9 Oz. 
Pole diameter
9 millimeters (equals average)
vs
9.00 millimeters

Packaged weight 6 Lbs. 8 Oz. 
Packed size 8 X 23 Inches 


Scroll To Top

saved